1--- Structure based on Flow: SURFnet 4.8-9 Registration Desk (Self-service token registration) and Flow: SURFnet 4.4 Mobile Application with Optical Scan + NFC +Selfie, to be combined with Jule's detailed structure below...
I Optional initial vetting request registration during which vetting arrangements are made, if needed
I_AUTHORIZE (optional)
?_AUTHENTICATE typically a username/password login
I_CHECK_ELIGIBILITY Is the applicant associated with participating organisation and eligible for the estrangement of 2FA, if there are restrictions
I_SELECT_FACTOR if there are several options
I_REQUEST_FACTOR the applicant must also provide the delivery address
I_FACTOR_DELIVERY Optional sending the physical factor (typically a token), if such is used, and if this is a part of the provided service
I_ARRANGE_VETTING Optional, only if the e-mail is used for to communicate the code or appointment details or other relevant interaction, when this could be piggybacked to it)
I_PREREGISTER_FACTOR (optional) factor (token) preregistration, if the applicant is expected to possess a token at the time of registration; alternatively, this is done during the vetting
I_CREATE_CODE Used for later token activation or to identify the registered vetting application at the beginning of the actual vetting
I_GET_EMAIL_ADDRESS If e-mail is used, from the IdP account data or applicant herself
I_MAKE_APPOINTMENT Optional scheduling of the vetting, only if the load at the service desk requires this
I_COMMUNICATE_VETTING_INFO with token activation or QR code, email validation link, instructions, application link, service desk contacts or address and appointment details, or whatever is needed
I_VALIDATE_EMAIL Optional, if an e-mail is required for further interaction and a valid e-mail address is not already accessible and assured/guaranteed from the IdP data upon password login
V Do the vetting
V_NEGOTIATE (optional, related to U_SCHEDULE_VETTING)
V_CONFIRM_AVAILABILITY can be rejected if the service desk operator or front or back-end services are not available
V_USE_VETTING_CODE if there was U_CREATE_VETTING_CODE - service or operator check the code provided by the applicant
V_CHECK_ELIGIBILITY Same as V_CHECK_ELIGIBILITY. Even if I_ELIGIBILITY_CHECK was performed, the applicant situation may change in the meantime; may include I_AUTHENTICATION, check/examination of a directory, federated identity, or written institutional certificate.
V_PRESENT_PROOF applicant presents a proof of identity, typically a sanctioned type of picture ID doc with demographic and biometric data
(V_CREATE_DIGITAL_IDENTITY optional, only if the applicant does not already possess IdP identity (weak or 1st factor identity), done before V_VET_APPLICANT_IDENTITY in order to allow parallelism at the service desk; should be undo-able if V_VET_APPLICANT_IDENTITY fails. Includes creation of the username and the password and check of their alignment with the enforced policies)
C_SELECT_FACTOR defined at C
V_HAND_OVER_FACTOR optional (if the token is provided by the service desk)
V_APPLICANT_IDENTITY detailed check of ID validity and match with the person
V_VET_ PROOF read and inspect the ID doc, compare the user name with the vetting request, check ID security features, optionally electronically read the ID doc, optionally externally check doc validity, compare photo/biometrics match with the person,
V_CHECK_LIVENESS optional, in case online identity vetting, otherwise implied by V_VET_ PROOF conducted with the user
V_RECORD_PROOF_AUDIT_DATA optional, typically by recording the last digits of ID doc number (avoid recording excess personal data, photos of the person or ID doc)
V_USE_TOKEN if HAND_OVER_TOKEN, done by the user in parallel with V_VET_APPLICANT_IDENTITY
V_PASSWORD_AUTHENTICATION like U_PASSWORD_AUTHENTICATION
V_REGISTER_TOKEN like U_INTRODUCE_FACTOR could be standalone even without V_HAND_OVER_TOKEN, but unnecessary with U_INTRODUCE_FACTOR/U_PREREGISTER_TOKEN and V_USE_VETTING_CODE; the used token will be later bound to digital identity
V_RECORD if both V_VET_APPLICANT_IDENTITY and V_USE_TOKEN if HAND_OVER_TOKEN were successful, otherwise reverse V_CREATE_DIGITAL_IDENTITY
B I would move F_SELECTION DEFINED and F_AUTHENTICATION earlier
2---------------------------
new Structure based on yesterdays discussion:
C Commons
- Authenticate Exiting Factor
- Use Introduced Factor
- Eligibility check
I Initiation/Initiate → what is needed here?
- Request
- Factorselection???
- Code (e.g. QR-Code)
- Appointment
V Vetting/Vet
- Proof
- Liveness
- Source
- Record
- 2 different records
B Binding/Bind (if Enrollment or Issuance are overloaded by the existing frameworks or often used with different meaning)
- DigitalID
- Activation
- Confirmation
3 -------------------------------
C Commons
#short description
C_AUTHN_??? Authenticate Existing Factor → TODO: short intuitive label
#short description
Input:
Output:
C_USE_??? Use Introduced Factor → TODO: short intuitive label
Usage of the introduced factor may serve multiple purposes at different stages.
E.g. Use introduced factor to test functioning, to prove knowledge/possession/inheritance/... or to make sure factors match.
Input:
Output:
C_ELIGIBILITYCHECK Check Eligiblity of Applicant
Check if the applicant is eligible to request an additional factor.
Input: user information
Output: decision: eligible (yes/no)
I Initiation?/(pre-)registration?
Initiate the registration of an additional factor.
Note: * is used as a wildcard. Set the appropriate value which applies to the specific action.
1F: may be used to indicate that a specific action refers to the first factor
2F: may be used to indicate that a specific action refers to the second factor
I_REQUEST Factor Request
In order to request an additional factor the applicant provides user information.
There are multiple options to realize this subactivity, e.g.: using federated login, e-mail, showing up at an registration desk, etc.
Input: user information (e.g. name, affiliation)
Output: factor request
I_SELECTION User Selects Factor
User selects a new factor/authenticator for multi factor authentication.
There may be different factor (types), e.g. something you know/have/are, the user can choose from
as well as multiple realization options/products per factor (e.g. Yubikey, Google Authenticator), here referred as authenticators.
Input: List of possible factors/authenticators
Output: factor selected/assigned and known/in possession/... by the user
REFERENCED FROM: B
*F_AUTHENTICATION
User authenticates with a specific factor. This action may be used for multiple purposes:
This action may be used for the first factor (i.e. 1F_AUTHENTICATE) in order to check first factor knowledge/possession/inheritance/... or as a mean to provide user information (i.e. as a sub action of 2F_REQUEST).
The action may also be used for the second/third/... factor to create an initial binding between digital ID and factor.
This initial binding typically needs to be verified requiring the vetting of the user's identity before it is put into effect.
It may also be used to (cross-) check second/third/... factor knowledge/possession/inheritance/...
Input:
Output:
REFERENCED FROM: B
V Identity Vetting
Capture and verify information about a user for identification.
(Optional) V_SCHEDULE Identification session arrangement and scheduling
Schedule an identification session in order to identify the user.
Optional action. Real-time interaction may not be required.
Input:
Output: identity vetting appointment
Effect on LoA: not applicable
V_PROOF???
Compare the claimed identity (information) which is transmitted by the user or system with user's identity proof (e.g. ID doc, activation code).
Input:
Output:
Effect on LoA:
V_LIVENESS Perform Liveness Check
In case online identity vetting mechanisms are used (such as video identification, online document upload) a liveness check may be performed to prevent fraud.
Example1: Show ID document besides the head to prove ID document and holder match.
Example2: Upload ID document and real-time recorded selfie.
Input: any mean to show liveness
Output:
Effect on LoA: ???
(Optional) V_SOURCE
Check user's identity proof (e.g. national ID document, employee ID card) against its original source for validity.
Make sure the identity proof is not expired/revooked/invalid/...
Input: user's identity proof
Output: verified identity proof
Effect on LoA: typically higher LoA require this action
V_RECORD Record Identity Proof
For accountability purposes (parts of) the identity proof (e.g. last 6 digits of national ID document) is recorded.
Input: identity proof
Output: record
Effect on LoA: not applicable
B Binding
Establishment of a binding between the digital identity of the user and factor
(Optional) F_SELECTION DEFINED AT: F
Selection of a particular factor/authenticator may take place while or after identity vetting.
Besides the selection by the user an assignment of a factor/authenticator e.g. by the registration desk is possible, too.
Input: List of possible factors/authenticators
Output: factor selected/assigned and known/in possession/... by the user
B_DIGITALID Bind factor to digital ID
Create a binding between the introdcued factor and the digital ID of the user based on a verified user identity.
Input: verified user identity, digital ID of user, factor
Output: binding between digital ID and factor
B_ACTIVATE Activate Binding of Digital ID and New Factor
Activate the binding of the digital ID of the user and the new factor.
This action is triggered by the registration authority.
Input: binding between digital ID and factor
Output: decision: activation successful/unsuccessful
B_CONFIRMATION Inform User about Factor Activation
Inform the user about the correct or incorrect activation of the factor.
In case the factor activation was successful the user can now authenticate using more than one factor.
This action is triggered by the registration authority.
Input: result of factor activation (positive/negative)
Output: message to user
------------------------------------------------------ Template for providing example realization options ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Example realization options
| Federated Login |
Short description | Federated login is used to provide user information |
Input | User information (e.g. name, email, organization) typically via a SAML assertion |
Output | Factor request |
Advantages | |
Drawbacks/Risks |
Activity | Subactivity | Subsubactivity | Mapping I (Identity/Identification) F (Factor) → 1F if first factor, 2F if second factor | Mandatory/optional? (typically) | Input (typically) | Output (typically) | (Security) risks if omitted (general) | Dependencies (could be quite specific) | Increases/Decreases LoA (general) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRq 1) 2FA token request | 1.0) Should we have a first factor authentication subactivity here as a gatekeeper for "User provides user info" FRq.UI 1.1) User provides user info | F_request (e.g. 2F_request if second factor is requested) | mandatory | user information (e.g. name, email, organization, e.g. via SAML assertion) | token request |
| Eligibility either needs to be checked in 1.1 or 3.1 | N/A | |
FReg 2) 2FA (pre-)registration | FReg.Sel 2.1) User selects factor | N/A, see F_select | optional | ||||||
FReg.Authc 2.2) User performs authentication with that factor for binding and to prove possession/knowledge/... | N/A, see F_authenticate | optional | |||||||
Ident 3) Identification (eligibility check;identity vetting using ID doc or alternative identity assertion method;unsure match of the person and her digital identity) | Ident.Sched 3.0) Identification session arrangement and scheduling (!optional) | I_schedule | |||||||
Ident.ElegC 3.1) Check eligiblity of user & possession of first factor | I_checkEligibility 1F_authenticate | optional if already performed in 1.1 | |||||||
Ident.UVet 3.3) Vet identity of user | |||||||||
Ident.UVet.CkClm 3.3.1) Compare claimed/transmitted/spoken information with user's identity proof (e.g. ID doc, activation code) | I_vet_???? | mandatory | |||||||
Ident.UVet.ULive 3.3.2) Perform Liveness Check (e.g. ID doc photo vs. real life face/ selfie) | I_vet_liveness | ||||||||
Ident.UVet.IDVal 3.3.3) Check user's identity proof with its original source for validity | I_vet_originalSource | optional | ↓ | ||||||
Ident.UVet.Rec 3.3.4) Record identity proof (par of ID doc, or just note success???) | I_record | ||||||||
FBind 4) Token binding | FBind.Poss 4.1) User chooses own token or handover of token to user (possession) | F_select | optional when activity 2 took place | ||||||
FBind.DigID 4.2) Bind factor to digital ID | F_bind | mandatory, may already be performed in step 2 precondition: successful 3.2.1) | |||||||
FBind.FPoss 4.3) Token-proof of-possession (e.g. test authentication) | 2F_authenticate | optional | |||||||
FBind.FAct4.4) Factor activation & record | F_activate F_record | mandatory precondition: successful 3.2.1 | |||||||
FBind.FAck 4.5) Inform user about factor activation | F_confirmActivation |
2FA token request | 2FA token (pre-)registration | Identification | Token binding | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1) User provides user info | 2.1) User selects 2FA token | 2.2) User performs authentication with that token to prove possession | 3.1) Eligibility check of user | 3.2) Vet identity of user | 4.1) User chooses own token or handover of token to user | 4.2) Bind token to digital ID | 4.3) Token-proof-of-possession | 4.4) Token activation & record | 4.5)Inform user | |||
3.2.1) Compare claimed/transmitted/spoken information with user's identity proof | 3.2.2) Check user's identity proof with its original source for validity | 3.2.3) Record identity proof | ||||||||||
Method | ||||||||||||
Live video | federated login | (checked in 1.1 via login) | ||||||||||
... | ||||||||||||