Versions Compared

Old Version 8

changes.mady.by.user Niels van Dijk

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Niels van Dijk

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

    • World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
      • Verifiable Credentials
    • Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
      • SD-JWT-VC
      •  OAuth 2.0 Attestation-Based Client Authentication

      • IETF PAR (RFC9126)

      • IETF DPoP (RFC9449)

    • International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
      • mDL and mDOC, ISO 18013-5
    • OpenID Foundation
      • OpenID for Identity Assurance 1.0
      • OpenID Federation 1.0
      • OpenID for Verifiable Credential Issuance
      • OpenID for Verifiable Presentations
      • OpenID for Verifiable Credential HAIP
    • Decentralized Identity Foundation (DIF)

...

    • Identity: National federation , eduGAIN & REFEDs
    • Educational Credentials: OpenBadges, EMREX, ELMO, others?

Other

  • Other: EBSI


Transformative aspects

  • We currently have full control over the governance of our AAI ecosystem, it is likely we will need to share at least some of controle in a new wallet ecosystem.
  • We currently need to have full controle over our governance, as we are doing a lot of the heavy lifting ourselfs. Goverment identity is less usefull for our day to day processes, and other sectors are not as well organised. In a new wallet ecosystem we may have the opportunity to reuse or recycle technical components, standarts, trust infrastuctures and hence their governance to our benefit. This might be relevant for:
    • Software development (issuer/verifier and wallet). High level of inreroperability required for a functioning EU wallet ecosystem may reduce the need to run our own implementations
    • Managing definitions and level of assurance of (incoming) identities and credentials. While a lot of our requirements are defined by workflows common in our sector, we may be able to piggyback on processes esteblished elsewhere in the ecosystem
    • Trust framework(s)


Opportunities

  • Many of the specs are written by small group of people, oppertunity for influence
  • Education is seen as a key use case
  • IF the trustframe allows for delegation of responsibilities to sectors, we may have an opportunity to align the existing ecosystem with the wallet ecosystem, whih would help us manage/align the governance as well

Risks

  • Most EU standarisation is behind closed doors and politisized
  • Unclear how EUDI will be goverened in the future
  • Unclear how much impact EUDI will have. If it does not go beyond Government based data, our sector will maybe create a parallel ecosystem



Children Display