| Panel | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
This section describes the plan to move the greenhouse concept forward.
Aim of this project: define a model to sustain the software developed by the GEANT association as a whole (including its members and/or associated peers worldwide).
|
Detailed project plan:
Project Management Phases
| PHASE | DESCRIPTION | COMMENT | ASSIGNED TO | START DATE | END DATE | STATUS | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-project (preparation) |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Concept definition | ||||||||||||||||||
| Activity Name | Description | Comment | Start Month | End Month | Status | |||||||||||||
| Explore approaches to sustain software produced in the context of a collaboration where no model is already in place. | The idea of the Greenhouse has been discussed for a while. Most of All the background work has been done and it is available on this wiki space. See: Differentiating the TERENA Greenhouse | NH | Oct10/2013 | Nov11/2014 |
| Done
| ||||||||||||
| 2. Initiation | Gather requirements and the options to implement the greenhouse | |||||||||||||||||
| 2.1 Needs assessment | Document list of requirements for different products.
| Output: Assess a select number of key products. | Assigned Possible tools to asses: | Open Conext, File Sender, Simple SAMLphp, MediaMosa, (TCS software?) Update 210115: SimpleSAMLphp and Filesender have completed the product needs assessment and Surfnet have promised to complete. Initial sounding call with Apereo undertaken. See alsoInformal conversation with some of the project is ongoing for some time. See: Product Needs AssessmentOutput: Assess a select number of key products. | NH | 12 Jan Feb 2015 | 20 Jan Feb 2015 |
| ||||||||||
| 2.2 Gather Gathering info on models to implement the greenhouse | Short list of possible approaches that matches match the core requirements identified in 2.1.Assigned to:
| Output: a matrix on the wiki with possible approaches. Possible existing organisations to interview are: NLLab, OSS Watch, Apereo. This task can start in parallel with 2.1 as some of the aspects are known. See also: Software Sustainability Within the TERENA Community Differentiating the TERENA Greenhouse Update 090415: Uploaded preliminary (draft) document (Greenhouse Possible Approches v0.1.docx) based on the product needs assessment completed so far. | AS | 20 2 Feb 201520 | 27 Feb 2015 |
| ||||||||||||
| 2.3 Document to present Presenting the most suitable options | Prepare a document to present a short list of options and their risks/benefits.Assigned to: | Output: short document with recommendations on the approach to implement | LF | 23 23 Feb 2015 27 March 2015
| Planned for 15 May 2015 First version Delivered 26 May 2015 There was a presnetation at the TAC where support was received from NORDUNET, AARNET and I2. |
| ||||||||||||
| 3. Selection | ||||||||||||||||||
| Select most suitable model | Select the approach to implement | The preliminary work carried out in the previous step resulted in recommending to partner with an exiting company which would effectively operate the greenhouse framework. A presentation was given at the TAC meeting during TNC.
| 27 March 2015 | 3 April 2015 | Management | 17 Aug 2015 | PID sent to the Amsterdam MT. The PID was presented to the PMO on 25th of Aug. |
| ||||||||||
| 4. Execution | Implement the selected model. Assigned to: |
TNC could be a good opportunity to gather some feedback if a proof-of-concept were available. | 6 April 2015 | Mid Jun | ||||||||||||||
| Status | title |
|
| |||||||||||||||
| Phase 1 - Mid Sep- End Nov |
| Output: workshop report with communty feedback
| LF | 30 Sep 2015 | 30 Sep 2015 |
| ||||||||||||
| 2. Incude feedback from the workshop and start the testing phase fo the Greenhouse with the FileSender team | External work - LF to gather the feedback. The final deadline to conclude the work was moved to Jan as per FileSender request. | 1 Oct 2015 TBC after the workshop |
30 jan 2016 |
| ||||||||||||||
| 3. Define the conditions for a MoU with the third party organisation running the greenhouse | Output draft MoU to be discussed with the SIG | NH | 1 Nov 2015 This work item will effectively start in Jan |
30 Jan 2016 |
| |||||||||||||
| 4. Provide evaluation report from Fliesender experience and proposal for permanent greenhouse structure. | Output: report | File Sender team | 1 Nov 2015 Deadline moved as File Sender test is not finished yet. |
30 Jan 2016 |
| |||||||||||||
| 5. Closing Phase 1 | Output: MoU witht NLNet | Not started | ||||||||||||||||