| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| 25min | Section 2 Attribute Authority | Christos Kanellopoulos (grnet) Lalla Mantovani Davide Vaghetti | - Christos suggested that it could be good to have the same structure for all the items in Section 2. It followed a short discussion and the following structure emerged as the a viable approach: Models/Technologies/Use Cases/Emerging Patterns/Issues.
- It is well understood that for the Use Cases and Technologies sub-sections are to be filled, completed first; only later, the Models, Emerging Patterns and Issues sub-sections could be really worked out.
|
| 5min | Section 1 Existing relevant works | Christos Kanellopoulos (grnet) | - Christos invited to take into account all the previous works on the subject, and first of all MJRA1.1;
- A new section was inserted to link the existing relevant works;
|
| 25min | Section 3 Token Translation Service | Davide Vaghetti Lalla Mantovani Christos Kanellopoulos (grnet) | - Davide pointed out that Token Translation Service (TTS) actually lack a strong definition, so each time we speak about it we have to choose which Technologies are TTS or not (TCS is the most apparent case), so he proposed to create a Definition item in the TTS section;
- Christos suggested not to divide the items in Section 3 by protocols translations services, but by main topics (like in Section 2); Lalla pointed out that we can change the structure but we should not loose focus on the protocols, since they are the real business of TTS; with all the comments and views in mind, it was agreed to make some modification to the Section 3 to take into account all the hints;
|
| 10min | Section 4 Attribute Translation | Davide Vaghetti Christos Kanellopoulos (grnet) Martin Haase | - Christos invited not to put too much efforts on Section 4, since that specific topic will be dealed off in greater detail in AARC2;
- Martin told us that he can gather some information on the current discussion on "Group membership to authorisation";
- Davide said that the work Section 4 will be informative and not
|
| 10min | Section 5 Delegation of Authorisation | Nicolas Liampotis Martin Haase Ahmed Shiraz Memon | - Nicolas suggested that a more formal structure (like in Section 2) could be used for Section 5 too;
- The initial title of Section 5 — Delegation of Authorisation Management — was deemed somehow ambiguos, it was agreed to get rid of the world "Management", and maybe review it once again after we have some content;
|
| 10min | Section 6 Non Web Access | Ahmed Shiraz Memon Davide Vaghetti | - Shiraz, to avoid duplication of efforts already made in other Tasks (namely the Blueprint), made a proposal to anchor the content of the Non Web Access section to the very topics of JRA1.4, so two items were added in the section: Attribute Management and Token Translation;
|
| 10min | Section 7 Level of Assurance for attributes | Ahmed Shiraz Memon Nicolas Liampotis Davide Vaghetti | - It still remain questionable if there is the case for LOA for Attributes in JRA 1.4; it was agreed to investigate further and then decide if the section could stay or be deleted;
|
| 15min | Section 8 Consent | Nicolas Liampotis | - Nicolas proposed to move the Consent content in the Issues items of relevant Section 2 points;
|
| 15min | Assignments and next VC | | - Since the VC lasted too long, only few actions could be assigned, there will be a next round of assignments either via aarc-jra1 mailing list or in the next VC;
- Next VC will be held next week, it follows a foodle on the aarc-jra1 mailing list;
|
