...
- review of open Action items
- contributing to VC subgroup as a T7 task is mentioned in the RAG reporting for September. More formal statements needed?
- review of the individual work package contents and status as per T7 work items and process
- walk through the list and update
- work item proposal for this group: RFC ‘Academic Base Credential’ for wallet identity:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JnVsVZwZWKhiJdx1m554xnanhUxoVsavYJiBXkg1se0/edit?usp=sharing- proposal: add (or link) it to the work item 5 and add a similar text for other credentials our community is authoritative for, like (different flavours of) educational achievements (other types of credentials missing?)
- We are eager to include results from Esther's REFEDS subcommittee on VCs: https://wiki.refeds.org/display/STAN/VC+Subcommittee
- As a further reference, those are the slides shown in the context of the ENHANCE alliance20240919 ENHANCE IT Knowledge Hub - Input on Identities .pdf) recently (overlapping substantially with the infoshare)
- Planning the report writing: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XuKIn3wXe9-laNcbTUmAXznVrvrtQUWL_AfJmEc6-t8/edit
- review of the chaptering in the report, also in the light of the feedback from the infoshare
- proceed to define authors of the individual chapters in the report, they should be able to copy paste from the work package results
...
Action | Who | Deadline | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Infoshare questionnaire and video material to participants | Maarten | asapopen | done! |
prepare review of T2 for T7 review | Marina | 9 Oct | open |
Review Report layout | all | 9 Oct | open |