...
Action | Who | What | Status |
---|---|---|---|
Gyongyi | GIP 2021&2022
|
| |
Gyongyi | GIP 2022
| Partially done, only open SIG/TF liaison | |
Gyongyi | GIP 2023
| Open | |
Gyongyi | GCC new members
| Done | |
Paul, Tryfon, Gyongyi | Cost covering for GCC members and GPPC member for costs claim | ||
Gyongyi | GCP Dashboard:
| Open | |
Gyöngyi Horváth and all GCC member | Annual report:
| Open | |
Gyongyi | Presentation repository Creation of a publicly available repository for all TF/SIG presentations / documentations - Plans to use Zenodo at least for a trial period. | Open | |
Gyongyi and all | Code of conduct
| Open | |
Claudio, Paul, Gyongyi | GIP
| Open | |
Gyöngyi Horváth Claudio | New idea proposal on NRENs as data mover infrastructures - points made from the discussion:
| Open | |
Continuous | Gyöngyi Horváth and ALL | Come up with a topic for a one of workshop (to take place ideally in each quarter per year) the GCC chairs will decide via email (size ~20 pax) | Open (continuously): |
Claudio, Paul | Claudio and Paul to bring up the question and ask for additional resources to GEANT and the GA for the GCP. - Open (request already submitted - resource areas of TFs/SIGs are to be evaluated by Gyongyi) | Open | |
Gyongyi | Related to the coordination with the GPPC / FFPA; Channel back to the TF/SIG leaders for feedback on trends and view on future perspectives. Gyongyi to prepare the email and notify the GCC members. | Open | |
Janos, Sabine | Related to the coordination with the GPPC / FFPA; Whitepaper to be reviewed by the original proposers and also by the GCC | Open | |
ALL | Each GCC representative (alongside GCC coordinator) can follow up with leads regarding outdated KPIs. | Continuous | |
| ALL | Think of new ways to bring in ideas and suggestions from the Community and NRENs into the preparation phase and feed them in to GPPC and others. | open |
Action Log - Closed Actions
Action Log - Closed Actions
Community Award |
| Done | |
Community website | Creation of a new community webpages | Done | |
GIP | Final report template | Done | |
Gyöngyi Horváth , Janos, Claudio | GCC members individual interview feedback (document updated by Paul):
| done | |
ALL | GCC members should provide updates on their individual expertise areas. | Done | |
ALL | GCC members, Gyongyi and the Marcomms team: develop new representative presentation of the GCP thematic areas and activities | Done: https://wiki.geant.org/display/TTC | |
Gyöngyi Horváth & Sabine | GCP infoshare: autumn infoshare before the GA meeting with specific TF/SIG activities and statistics. Highlight the content of the TF/SIG meetings and find a way for better visibility of agendas / content prior to the meetings – Sabine and Gyongyi to work on this together. | Done | |
| Chair | Talk with the SIG-MM Steering Committee about producing an overview / matrix of VC tools / comparison (pros and cons) | Done - SC takes it as objective 2022 |
ALL | GCC members to work on content recommendations for TNC22 before September 2021: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IxEGYXs1Z4CbgVauLeEvcceGFqcV0NYdi9bXGMJVlG8/edit?usp=sharing | Done | |
ALL | Contribute any missing information (regarding established TFs/SIGs information) to Gyöngyi (who is in charge of the document) also considering the impact section: achievements, topics and link to projects / results (e.g. eduroam...etc). Thematic areas supported | Done | |
Gyongyi | Related to the coordination with the GPPC / FFPA; Channel back to the TF/SIG leaders for feedback on trends and view on future perspectives. Gyongyi to prepare the email and notify the GCC members. | Done | |
ALL | Each GCC representative (alongside GCC coordinator) can follow up with leads regarding outdated KPIs. | Done | |
| ALL | Think of new ways to bring in ideas and suggestions from the Community and NRENs into the preparation phase and feed them in to GPPC and others. | done |
Janos, Sabine | Related to the coordination with the GPPC / FFPA; Whitepaper to be reviewed by the original proposers and also by the GCC | Community Award |
| Done | Community website | Creation of a new community webpages | Done | GIP | Final report template | Done |
Gyöngyi Horváth , Janos, Claudio | GCC members individual interview feedback (document updated by Paul):
| done | |
ALL | GCC members should provide updates on their individual expertise areas. | Done | |
ALL | GCC members, Gyongyi and the Marcomms team: develop new representative presentation of the GCP thematic areas and activities | Done: https://wiki.geant.org/display/TTC | |
Gyöngyi Horváth & Sabine | GCP infoshare: autumn infoshare before the GA meeting with specific TF/SIG activities and statistics. Highlight the content of the TF/SIG meetings and find a way for better visibility of agendas / content prior to the meetings – Sabine and Gyongyi to work on this together. | Done | |
| Chair | Talk with the SIG-MM Steering Committee about producing an overview / matrix of VC tools / comparison (pros and cons) | Done - SC takes it as objective 2022 |
ALL | GCC members to work on content recommendations for TNC22 before September 2021: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IxEGYXs1Z4CbgVauLeEvcceGFqcV0NYdi9bXGMJVlG8/edit?usp=sharing | Done | |
ALL | Contribute any missing information (regarding established TFs/SIGs information) to Gyöngyi (who is in charge of the document) also considering the impact section: achievements, topics and link to projects / results (e.g. eduroam...etc). Thematic areas supported | Done | |
ALL | General) if you find any discrepancies on the wiki pages, please email Gyöngyi | done | |
ALL | We can try and have a first try with metric benchmark before we meet in November (can therefore see how we can improve it) | done | |
Gyöngyi Horváth | Following above action, Gyöngyi to ensure the information from SIGs/TFs regarding opinions on impact assessment are provided to GCC (create dashboard) | done | |
Claudio | Bring up point 2 under Item 4 to the other parties (Community, PMO) to see what they think is it “organize meeting with TFs and SIGs ? | done | |
Gyöngyi to send a document around outlining her vision for meeting set ups, people can suggest their preferences. | Done | ||
Innovation Programme:
| Done | ||
Gyöngyi Horváth | Community Award to have it revamped – better visibility and community engagement throughout the year and recognition of the award recipients. - Gyongyi to prepare with Marcomms | Done | |
Gyöngyi Horváth | GCP wiki pages synchronization and update in line with the new Community webpages on the GEANT website - Gyongyi to prepare with Marcomms and TF/SIG coordinators | Done | |
Gyöngyi Horváth | TF-eHealth: approved - review it in one year time Gyongyi to notify proposer | Done | |
TF-DLC (Task Force - Distributed Ledger Computing) - approved with the new charter – Gyongyi to notify proposer | Done | ||
Mario | Related to eHealth: The GCC to speed up the process to create a new TF. And Mario and the eHealth community propose the area where the task force should work. | Done | |
Gyongyi | Gyongyi to propose an outline for the GCP Infoshare and help to schedule it. | Done | |
Gyongyi, Guido | Gyongyi to set up a meeting with Maria Ristkok and Guido Aben (and potentially with Claudio and Paul) to have an initial discussion about what they would like in terms of topics for a potential extension for SIG-CISS. | Done | |
Paul, Gyongyi | Prepare a proposal on how to measure effectiveness of the GEANT Innovation programme. GCP effectiveness: Apply the scorecard for TF/SIGs evaluation and align it with the GN4-3 reporting. | Done | |
Gyongyi | Minutes should reflect the process of the communication about that the NRENs are involved related to the GEANT Innovation Programme. This information about the NREN liaison will be reflected as part of the FAQ. We will make it clear in all communications: infoshare, website, guidelines and FAQ. | Done | |
ALL | GCC members to add additional contacts to the list of subject matter experts for the GEANT Innovation Programme possible reviewers, preferably by Thursday, 11 February midday. | Done | |
Paul and Gyöngyi | Paul and Gyöngyi to introduce the impact assessment document to GA | Done | |
Claudio, Paul and Gyöngyi | Community Programme Infoshare to be scheduled right before this meeting. | Done (infoshare postponed and scheduled after the Innovation Programme launch) | |
Gyöngyi | Gyöngyi to send a Doodle poll for the first week of December to gauge everyone’s availability for the infoshare. | Done, superseeded. | |
Gyongyi Horvath | Gyöngyi to set up a specific GÉANT innovation fund meeting to discuss the practicalities (December 10th, 10:00 CET) | Done | |
Gyongyi Horvath | Gyöngyi to provide a Google doc documenting the structure/requirements of the GÉANT innovation fund and share with the mailing list to request volunteers to assist. | Done | |
| ALL and Claudio | All GCC members to think of possible “missing themes and topics” we could include (e.g e-Health) as possible future TFs/SIGs. Claudio to create the document. | DONE |
| Claudio / Paul | Ask Task Forces and NRENs if there is a demand for opening an area for AI | DONE |
Paul | Invite Enzo Capone to the next GCC meeting | DONE | |
Gyongyi | Creation of short page summary of who is who and who does what | DONE | |
Paul | GÉANT organizational chart can be shared with community to identify right people to talk to | DONE | |
| GCC co-chair | to set up a meeting with PMO and GCC | Done - ongoing |
| Chair | Provide verbal/written response to Jan Meijer/OCRE | done |
| ALL | Provide final input on GCP Strategy doc | done |
19 Jun 2020 | Sabine | to share with RENATER’s matrix for VC tools (in French) | done |
| To propose a mechanism how to fund attendance at Standardization Groups. Document what should happen when we have an engaged head and funding pot. | CLOSED. | |
| Value statement for GÉANT running TFs and SIGs | Organising a TF or SIG meeting | |
| Value statement for the community programme - Terms of reference for the GCC | See above. | |
| Value statement for GÉANT running TFs and SIGs | Organising a TF or SIG meeting | |
Value statement / proposition from TF-CSIRT (Value to GEANT organisation having the brand in the incident response world Value to members and GEANT as network operator to have this collaboration Value in having a host with relatively little baggage (good reputation being neutral) Cost to GEANT members to have it hosted elsewhere will have a negative impact) | See TF-CSIRTKlasstf-csirt.org/2017/12/18/tf-csirt-defines-strategy/. | ||
| Value statement for the community programme - Terms of reference for the GCC | See above. | |
| GCC to create a statement to support the importance of keeping TF-CSIRT under GEANT | Done. | |
| contact Marcoms to help prepare a quarterly email to GA with summaries of blogs | COMPLETE - guidelines communicated to Rosanna Norman. | |
| Valter Nordh and Klaas Wierenga | Valter to discuss with Klaas about the practicalities of the PDOs and the group to have a plan for continuity | Took actions (Klaas and Valter to provide more information) Andrew: 2 PDOs (1 main and 1 shadowing) to follow a TF or SIG activities. |
| Value statement for a function of a PDO | Complete: Task Force and SIG Secretary Role / Task Force and SIG Coordinator Role | |
| Specialised interest experts communication - TF / SIG secretaries to identify which channels they use | Done: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1AGwaaG3kHlNMJ_xJeDbZT3IT3vixl3HfSfOC1H6pYnY/edit?usp=sharing | |
| Valter Nordh and Klaas Wierenga | VALTER / KLAAS to have a meeting together to discuss the overview of resources within GEANT | Done |
| Valter and Raimundas to find a time for a joint meeting | Done. | |
| Nicole Harris and Klaas Wierenga | to write a proposal for collaboration on supporting Small Projects with the Vietsch Foundation | Closed: Klaas had call with Valentino. At this moment the Vietsch Foundation is lacking proposals, and so are we. We have agreed to revisit this when the opportunity arises. |
|
|
| |
| Have a list of options available with conditions related to remote participation to the meetings and have an in depth discussion at the next meeting. (full experience remote attendance by host NREN, limited remote attendance, face-to-face only meeting) | Closed. | |
| Claudio Allocchio, Klaas Wierenga, Gyöngyi Horváth | Guidelines for TF / SIG chairs | Closed: TF and SIG Chair and Steering Committee members Guidelines |
| GEANT how many of those high effort meetings can it support | Closed: 4 workshop per year per the GN4-3 workplan | |
| Open Calls for Workshop - draft the process and requirement | Closed | |
| Valter will come back with a statement / overview of resources allocated to run the workshops by the next meeting. How many workshops can we run? | (See as above - 4 workshop per year) | |
| Circulate what resources are available for GN4-3 Community Programme | COMPLETE | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
| |||
|
| ||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
|
|
| |
| |||
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
...