...
| SimpleSAML response |
|---|---|
| How is the project currently funded? Do you receive money from individual organisations or from grants (e.g. GN3) | It's part of the Feide budget. |
| How do you intend to fund the project in the future? Would you expect the Greenhouse to collect funds from organisations or other funding sources? Are there any barriers to this? | Our idea is to finance the project based on contributions by consortium members. |
| Would you like the Greenhouse to pay individual developers or other staff for you? | Could be, depending on the model agreed upon |
| Would you like the Greenhouse to pay other bills for you, e.g. hosting costs, promotional materials etc. | Yes |
| What costs are currently associated with the project? | Approx. an FTE + (maybe) website hosting. |
| 2. LEGAL AGREEMENTS | SimpleSAML response |
|---|---|
| Do you have any contracts or consortium agreement arrangements for people to pay money in to the project? Would you require something like this in the future, are there any specific requirements around this and would you be happy using a generic framework proposed by the Greenhouse? | We don't have anything like that now, but we would like to explore that model. We need to review the generic framework and see if it fits, though it probably will. |
| Do you need the Greenhouse to manage contracts for staff such as developers? | Or with organizations / members helping with development. |
| Do you need the Greenhouse to act as a home / signing authority for other purposes (e.g. domain registration, home address etc). | Probably yes |
| Would you like to run your project yourself but need support in getting advice for writing agreements and managing contracts? | No, we want to have an active role in the architecture and design of SSP, but we don't necessarily need to run the project or take the final decisions. |
| What are the current licensing / IPR arrangements for the product? | Copyright by UNINETT, software with a LGPL 2.1 license. |
...