Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents

Overall information and licence lists

  • GÉANT Open

OSS licences descriptions

Permissive and copyleft licenses

Image Added

  • Permissive licences have simple requirements – to credit original work, describe changes, provide disclaimer…
  • Copyleft licences (“reciprocal”, “protective”, “restrictive”, derogatory: “viral”) require the rights to be preserved in derivative works
  • If you use any components (libraries) with copyleft, you are obliged to make derived source code available, which may include the entire product/project!
  • Permissive – do anything
    • MIT – short and simple
    • ISC (OpenBSD) – further shortened equivalent
    • BSD – some versions require to include the disclaimer
    • Apache 2.0 – requires notice of changes, grants licence to patents unless litigating and mentions preservation of trademark rights
  • Weak copyleft – file (library) scope
    • MPL 2.0 – simple, allows static linking and licence variants with additional terms
    • LGPL 2.1 – cleaned text of LGPL 2.0, allows dynamic linking without enforcing copyleft
    • LGPL 3.0 – grants use of patents; the end-user must be able to install a modified version – it prohibits closed devices, DRM or hardware encryption or patents retaliation; compatible with Apache2.0
  • Strong copyleft – project scope
    • GPL 2.0 – often used
    • GPL 3.0 – grants use of patents, the end-user must be able to install modified software, compatible with Apache2.0
    • AGPL 3.0 (Affero) – network protective: external use of modified(!) code requires its availability – network use is a distribution of the software, modified source code must be available
  • Proprietary – typically restrict user rights and protect commercial interests of copyright owners

Tabular or per-feature comparisons of licences and categorised lists

...

GPL licences compatibility


A chart illustrating compatibility relationships between different free software licenses.  For details, see the FSF's license list page.Image Added

(From https://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html)

  • Arrows are transitive and go from licences of the components toward the one of your project
  • Dotted line – “GPL 2 only” is not compatible with GPL 3”, but ”GPL 2 or later” is
  • AGPL
    • (L)GPL 3.0(+) components can be used, thanks to an explicit GPL rule
    • Code under AGPL cannot be used in (L)GPL projects unless dual-licensed

More A more detailed view with more precisely stated licences:

Floss license slide, showing connections from public domain to MIT, MIT to BSD-new, BSD-new to Apache and various versions of LGPL, LGPL to GPL, and GPL version 3 to Affero GPL version 3Image Added

(From David A. Wheeler 2007, https://web.archive.org/web/20210101030518/https://dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html, SVG variant:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility#/media/File:Floss-license-slide-image.svg)

...

Joinup Licensing Assistant,  https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/eupl/solution/joinup-licensing-assistant/jla-compatibility-checker

...

License Compatibility Checker software

In-licences (licences of components) are in rows, out-licences in columns:

!!LicencesImage Added

(Matrix from From https://events19github.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/OSLS-2019-Fulfilling-Open-Source-license-obligations-Can-checklists-help.pdfcom/HansHammel/license-compatibility-checker)

Open Source Automation Development Lab (OSADL) matrix and rules

In-licences are in columns, out-licences in rows:

!!Image Added

(Matrix from From https://events19.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/OSLS-2019-Fulfilling-Open-Source-license-obligations-Can-checklists-help.pdf)

More at

...

Risks of

...

permissive licences

Risk mitigation against potentially harmful legal threats or behaviours by free-software licenses

Frequently used protective and permissive licenses


AGPLv3

GPLv3

GPLv2.1

LGPLv3

LGPLv2.1

MPL-2

BSD

SaaS/cloud

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

No

Tivoization

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Patent trolling

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Proprietization

Yes

Yes

Yes

Partial

Partial

Partial

No

Granularity / reach

Project

Project

Project

Library

Library

File

N/A

Trademark grant

Yes

Yes

?

Yes

?

No

No

(From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-software_license)

...

...

...