...
| Activity | Subactivity | Subsubactivity | mandatory/optional? | Input | Output | (Security) risks if omitted | Dependencies | Increases/Decreases LoA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1) 2FA token request | 1.0) Should we have a first factor authentication subactivity here as a gatekeeper for "User provides user info" 1.1) User provides user info | mandatory | user information (e.g. name, email, organization, e.g. via SAML assertion) | token request |
| Eligibility either needs to be checked in 1.1 or 3.1 | N/A | ||
| 2) 2FA (pre-)registration | 2.1) User selects 2FA token | optional | |||||||
2.2) User performs authentication with that token for binding and to prove possession | optional | ||||||||
| 3) Identification (eligibility check;identity vetting using ID doc or alternative identity assertion method;unsure match of the person and her digital identity) | 3.0) Identification session arrangement and scheduling (!optional) | ||||||||
| 3.1) Eligibility check of user | optional if already performed in 1.1 | ||||||||
3.3) Vet identity of user | |||||||||
| 3.3.02) Proof First factor posession | optional | 3.3) Vet identity of user||||||||
| 3.3.1) Compare claimed/transmitted/spoken information with user's identity proof (e.g. ID doc, activation code) | mandatory | ||||||||
3.3.2) Perform Liveness Check (e.g. ID doc photo vs. real life face/ selfie) | |||||||||
| 3.3.3) Check user's identity proof with its original source for validity | optional | ↓ | |||||||
| 3.3.4) Record identity proof | |||||||||
| 4) Token binding | 4.1) User chooses own token or handover of token to user | optional when activity 2 took place | |||||||
4.2) Bind token to digital ID | mandatory, may already be performed in step 2 precondition: successful 3.2.1) | ||||||||
| 4.3) Token-proof of-possession (e.g. test authentication) | optional | ||||||||
| 4.4) Token activation & record | mandatory precondition: successful 3.2.1 | ||||||||
| 4.5) Inform user about token activation |
...